Monday, June 30, 2008
Chingoka slams ICC decision as unethical
June 30, 2008, Peter Chingoka, the chairman of Zimbabwe Cricket, has criticised Ray Mali, the ICC's outgoing president, for tabling a motion to discuss the future of Zimbabwe when the ICC meets in Dubai this week.
In two letters which followed Mali's announcement, Chingoka forcibly reminded him that the ICC had already discussed the matter. "You will recall that last year in London, a decision was taken and well-supported by you and other members that sport and politics, like oil and water, do not mix."
Quoting the ICC's own rules, Chingoka insisted that Zimbabwe's status could only be discussed at next year's annual conference as such a motion needed to be tabled by December 31 in the preceding year. Ironically, a change to the rules was proposed two years ago to allow more immediate action to be taken. Chingoka opposed that at the time and the move was defeated after India indicated they would not support it.
The letters also highlighted a breakdown in relations between Chingoka and Mali, hitherto seen as close allies. Less than a year ago, Mali was effusive in his praise for the ZC administration following a six-day fact-finding visit. But last week he told Chingoka that he had acted because he "owed it to the cricket community to feel all is normal
Chingoka, playing the race card, warned Mali of "setting double standards and discriminatory levels that go against the ICC anti-racism code".
He went on to accuse Mali of making Zimbabwe "a scapegoat" for the decision to stand down Malcolm Speed as the ICC's chief executive in April and called the latest announcement of the discussion on Zimbabwe "unethical", adding it was an "agenda item infested with political connotations". He concluded by asking: "Whose political gallery these antics are being supposed to appease?"
"There are over 100 ICC member countries with differing political environments," he continued. "Without venturing to mention names as it is apparent, it is clear that certain worse conditions exist in those other member countries. It has not warranted the ICC putting them on its agenda as it is doing with Zimbabwe right now."
Source: www. cricinfo.com
Labels:
icc,
india,
Peter Chingoka,
Ray Mali,
Zimbabwe Cricket
India to block Zimbabwe's ouster from ICC
Powerful India will oppose any moves to throw strife-torn Zimbabwe out of world cricket and is counting on the rest of the Asian bloc for support, a senior official told AFP on Monday.
"There is no reason to remove Zimbabwe," Indian cricket board secretary Niranjan Shah told AFP as the International Cricket Council (ICC) debated the African country's future at its annual meetings here.
Cricket boards of South Africa and England last week suspended bilateral ties with Zimbabwe in protest at the deteriorating political situation in Harare, where Robert Mugabe has been controversially re-elected as president.
The ICC's decision-making executive board will take up the issue this week after the British government demanded that Zimbabwe be excluded from next year's Twenty20 World Championships in England.
The support of seven of the ICC's 10 full members, which include Zimbabwe, is required to suspend a nation from world cricket, but that appears unlikely given India's stance.
India, the sport's economic powerhouse, is almost certain to be backed by the three other Asian Test nations -- Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh -- on keeping Zimbabwe in the ICC.
The Asian bloc usually votes together on major cricket issues.
It was not immediately clear if Australia, the West Indies and New Zealand will back England and South Africa on Zimbabwe's exclusion.
"We understand England's position because their government wants Zimbabwe out," said Shah. "Even our tour commitments are determined by government advice.
"But we will back Zimbabwe to stay in the ICC."
If Zimbabwe retains its full membership, England risks losing the right to host the lucrative Twenty20 worlds in June next year if the British government denies visas to the Zimbabwean cricketers.
Zimbabwe has not played Test cricket since hosting India in September, 2005 after being told by the ICC to improve its playing standards.
But it retains an active one-day team which takes part in the World Cup.
Senior Zimbabwe cricket chief Ozias Bvute, meanwhile, questioned why several other boards were taking a hard-line position against his country when no other sporting organisation has opted for such a stance.
"We (Zimbabwe) are a full member of FIFA (football's governing body) and are currently participating in a World Cup qualifying campaign," Bvute told BBC's Test match special.
"We have a swimming programme which has produced Kirsty Coventry, a recent winner in the world championships.
"So it would be strange that the only sport to take action on so-called current worries is cricket when all the other world sporting bodies have not taken that stance."
soruce: cricbuzz.com
"There is no reason to remove Zimbabwe," Indian cricket board secretary Niranjan Shah told AFP as the International Cricket Council (ICC) debated the African country's future at its annual meetings here.
Cricket boards of South Africa and England last week suspended bilateral ties with Zimbabwe in protest at the deteriorating political situation in Harare, where Robert Mugabe has been controversially re-elected as president.
The ICC's decision-making executive board will take up the issue this week after the British government demanded that Zimbabwe be excluded from next year's Twenty20 World Championships in England.
The support of seven of the ICC's 10 full members, which include Zimbabwe, is required to suspend a nation from world cricket, but that appears unlikely given India's stance.
India, the sport's economic powerhouse, is almost certain to be backed by the three other Asian Test nations -- Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh -- on keeping Zimbabwe in the ICC.
The Asian bloc usually votes together on major cricket issues.
It was not immediately clear if Australia, the West Indies and New Zealand will back England and South Africa on Zimbabwe's exclusion.
"We understand England's position because their government wants Zimbabwe out," said Shah. "Even our tour commitments are determined by government advice.
"But we will back Zimbabwe to stay in the ICC."
If Zimbabwe retains its full membership, England risks losing the right to host the lucrative Twenty20 worlds in June next year if the British government denies visas to the Zimbabwean cricketers.
Zimbabwe has not played Test cricket since hosting India in September, 2005 after being told by the ICC to improve its playing standards.
But it retains an active one-day team which takes part in the World Cup.
Senior Zimbabwe cricket chief Ozias Bvute, meanwhile, questioned why several other boards were taking a hard-line position against his country when no other sporting organisation has opted for such a stance.
"We (Zimbabwe) are a full member of FIFA (football's governing body) and are currently participating in a World Cup qualifying campaign," Bvute told BBC's Test match special.
"We have a swimming programme which has produced Kirsty Coventry, a recent winner in the world championships.
"So it would be strange that the only sport to take action on so-called current worries is cricket when all the other world sporting bodies have not taken that stance."
soruce: cricbuzz.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)